2022 Audi Q4 e-tron Sportback quattro Data Assessment

By Peter Tran, EditorUpdated October 16, 2026MethodologySources: EPA specifications, NHTSA records, modeled assumptions

Automated assessment, not a hands-on review. Reliability proxies do not predict breakdowns; running economics excludes purchase price and depreciation.

59
out of 100
B-
#109 of 194 suvs · class median 61
Reliability proxies60
25% of overall
Efficiency49
25% of overall
Economics64
50% of overall

What these numbers mean for this model

This assessment uses the 2022 Audi Q4 e-tron Sportback quattro (Automatic (A1)) specification row: 241 miles rated range, 2.96 mi/kWh, and 82 kWh usable battery. It does not average every trim or model year. Its efficiency score is 49/100 within SUV peers. Changing the available peer set can change its relative score.

Fuel comparison: Audi Q7, 21 MPG, in the same SUV body class. Modeled annual fuel savings are $1,300; negative means the gas rival is cheaper to fuel. This is not an exact trim or purchase-price match. Local rates and charging habits can change the result; use the ownership calculator before making a purchase decision.

Evidence gaps

  • Recall records span available model-family records, not verified fleet exposure or complete year coverage. Check your VIN separately; zero stored recalls does not mean none exist.
  • No model-specific issue checklist is available; this metric receives a neutral score.
  • Battery estimate: 1.7% per year, based on a brand-level fallback, scored neutrally. The underlying curve is not independently verified here.
  • Charging speed is modeled from peak power; weather, battery temperature, and the charging curve can produce a different result.
  • This assessment remains usable but is excluded from search indexing until model-specific issue and battery evidence and an adequate same-class cohort are available.

What drives the score

Reliability proxies — 60/100

Recorded recall campaigns0 campaigns 60

0 campaigns across 1 model years with records. Coverage and fleet exposure are unverified, so this metric is neutral (60), not a breakdown-rate estimate. Zero records does not establish reliability.

Documented owner issuesNot yet curated 60

No curated issue list yet — scored neutrally rather than assumed clean.

Battery degradation1.7% / yr 60

Brand-level estimate — no model-specific dataset; scored neutrally (60).

Efficiency — 49/100

EPA efficiency2.96 mi/kWh 56

Miles per kWh vs other SUVs. Drives every cost figure on this site.

EPA range241 mi 33

Rated combined range. Expect 20-30% less in freezing weather.

Fast-charge speed62 mi / 10 min 51

Modeled from peak 175 kW using a 72% taper assumption; not a measured charging test.

Economics — 64/100

Energy cost per mile7.8¢/mi 56

Scenario assumptions: 80% home at 17¢/kWh, 20% public DC at 48¢/kWh; not live rates.

Fuel savings vs gas rival$1,300/yr 85

Against the Audi Q7 (21 MPG) at $3.92/gal, 12,000 mi/yr.

Modeled capacity-loss allowance$184/yr 60

Illustrative lost capacity × $132/kWh. Not a repair bill, replacement quote, resale loss, or probability of failure.

Road-trip charging cost$16.21 / 100 mi 56

Cost of 100 miles bought entirely at public DC fast chargers.

Ownership numbers at a glance

Energy cost per mile
7.8¢
Annual energy cost (12k mi)
$940
Fuel savings vs gas rival
$1,300/yr
Fast-charge speed
62 mi per 10 min
Modeled capacity-loss allowance
$184
NHTSA recall campaigns
0

Assumes 12,000 mi/yr, 80% home charging at $0.17/kWh and public DC at $0.48/kWh, gas at $3.92/gal. Scoring model v1.1.

Charging cost in your ZIP5-year cost of ownershipReal-world range

Top-scoring suvs